Forums
| Page 1 | |
|---|---|
Aqualightnin, January 2010, edited | |
“Weaponries Weaponries can be used to give your army extra attacking power by forging stronger weapons and tougher shields.” those last two words got me thinking. if it gives tougher shields (or armor, or whatever is the case of the unit you are using) wouldn't it reduce the number lost on the battlefield? I know this would make weaponries even more powerful, but I think a slight reduction in troops lost ON ATTACKS wouldn't hurt too much. thoughts? | |
CecilvonBismarck, January 2010, edited | |
|
it kind of already does since ur sending less troops to do the same job
|
|
Aqualightnin, January 2010 | |
|
ah true, didn't think of it that way :)
|
|
CecilvonBismarck, January 2010, edited | |
|
although, u may have found an idea to the solution to Rept Hai Venom being overpowered, each % of weaps could give a SoD like resistance to receiving it
on a side note as a disclaimer, if anything i write tonight(PST) doesnt make sense its because my head is swimming |
|
Halcyon, January 2010, edited | |
|
it's ok cecil we all know the greatest ideas came from drunkards
anyways weaponries are already a big part of why attackers are OPed, so i wouldn't make it more powerful. i guess we could reduce the bonus gains/offence boost but atm walls reduce losses (which i don't think is coded. !!) and i don't really like having the same effect for attackers |
|
Bolle, January 2010, edited | |
|
rept hai venom overpowered? pah. Booo!
@Aqualightning, how about this: cuz of the stronger shields they fight better, allowing you to take more land x) |
|
Aqualightnin, January 2010 | |
|
yea, just was thinking better armor = less casualties, forgot about sending less = less deaths
|
|
Bolle, January 2010 | |
|
well, you can try to give weaps more bonuses out of it but I'd rather change the description :P
|
|
Dev Lord Iluros, January 2010 | |
|
Yeah, weaponries are good enough as it is, and changing the description is easier. :D
|
|
Aqualightnin, January 2010 | |
|
lol meh its just 1 in the morning, had to bring up something to discuss... hahaha was bored :P figured no harm comes from discussion :P
~aqua |
|
CecilvonBismarck, January 2010 | |
|
btw im not drunk, if i was, my head wouldnt be hurting this bad till the mornin
|
|
| Page 1 | |